Pages: 1
By avatar! (Mar 07, 2012) (#1)
Currently I have 2, although the list may grow with time. They are:
Fire Emblem Shadow Dragon (new, factory sealed)
Final Fantasy IV
both are the North American release, complete, and like new, or new.
Let me know if interested.
Last edited by avatar! (Mar 07, 2012)
By Ashley Winchester (Mar 07, 2012) (#2)
Actually, I'm on a big DS kick at the moment.
Recently went through FFIII, FF The 4 Heroes of Light, Portrait of Ruin and Dawn of Sorrow.
I wouldn't mind having FFIV since I liked Matrix's work on III and The 4 Heroes of Light but I have the Complete Collection and the SNES original so I have enough FFIV to go around.
Edit: You wouldn't happen to have Castlevania: Order of Ecclesia? I'd like to nab that but I'm hesitant to put down the money. Don't want to sound like a wimp but I've heard it's difficult.
Also, it's hard to find DS titles complete with their cases in my area so if I see something I want I'll definately let you know.
Last edited by Ashley Winchester (Mar 07, 2012)
By avatar! (Mar 08, 2012) (#3)
Ashley Winchester wrote:
Actually, I'm on a big DS kick at the moment.
Recently went through FFIII, FF The 4 Heroes of Light, Portrait of Ruin and Dawn of Sorrow.
I wouldn't mind having FFIV since I liked Matrix's work on III and The 4 Heroes of Light but I have the Complete Collection and the SNES original so I have enough FFIV to go around.
Edit: You wouldn't happen to have Castlevania: Order of Ecclesia? I'd like to nab that but I'm hesitant to put down the money. Don't want to sound like a wimp but I've heard it's difficult.
Also, it's hard to find DS titles complete with their cases in my area so if I see something I want I'll definately let you know.
The DS is a great system! Fun games, inexpensive prices, no need to worry about setting anything up ![]()
I don't have Ecclesia. I've not played any of the DS Castlevania games, so let me know if they're worth it. If you change your mind on FFIV you can always let me know. By the way, Fire Emblem DS was a really fun game. It wasn't as amazing as Path of Radiance, but few games are. On the other hand, it was more fun than I expected, and a great remake. I'm selling this copy because I ended up with an extra.
By Ashley Winchester (Mar 13, 2012) (#4)
avatar! wrote:
I don't have Ecclesia. I've not played any of the DS Castlevania games, so let me know if they're worth it.
Personally, I would recommend Portrait of Ruin before I would recommend Dawn of Sorrow. Dawn of Sorrow was another Castlevania that felt kind of "off" to me much like Harmony of Dissonance did the GBA. Unfortunately, that feeling didn't make it more attractive which was the case with Dissonance. Still, playing Dawn right after Portrait was a blessing... I was rather hard on Portrait until completing Dawn and I realized I was being too harsh; it's probably my favorite "castleroid" after Symphony. Don't get wrong on that last statement; there is something Symphony has that the others don't but at the same time I really don't see the need to give the game anymore praise than it already receives. Everyone knows it's good, it is good and I'm fine with just leaving it at that.
As for Dawn, I have a strange feeling that I liked the first game (Aria) on the GBA more. That said, I love how the game employs the stylus with the magic seals. I thought I would hate this mechanic from what I saw in the past but it makes boss fights much more satisfying than they would otherwise be. The biggest stumbling block in the game is probably how weapons are crafted (by combining weapons with souls) rather the found through drops. I don't know why but I have much more patience when it comes to drops than the crafting which you have to combine with (soul) drops.
avatar! wrote:
If you change your mind on FFIV you can always let me know. By the way, Fire Emblem DS was a really fun game. It wasn't as amazing as Path of Radiance, but few games are. On the other hand, it was more fun than I expected, and a great remake. I'm selling this copy because I ended up with an extra.
In the case of FFIV, I'm curious to know if the battle system is still ATB based considering all of Matrix's other FF games are turned based. I wonder how well a ATB system would work with that engine.
I'm not so sure I'd dig the Fire Emblem games. I've seen them in action and, correct me if I'm wrong, but when a character dies in battle they are gone for good, right? When I play games I have a rather stout goal of perfection. I'd probably end up resetting the game battle after battle making sure all my units survived due to those annoying, ingrained tendencies.
But anyway, check your e-mail.
By avatar! (Mar 14, 2012) (#5)
FF IV DS is still ATB. It's still pretty much the original FF IV with movies, voices, and newer graphics.
Fire Emblem is such a wonderful series! Yes, if a character dies, they are gone for good! That's one of the things that make FE unique, is that death is permanent (although I think in some of the FE games you can find items that let you revive one character). However, in this rendition of Fire Emblem most of the characters are generic and if they die, they are replaced by equally generic characters. This is not the case for later games in the series, where each and every character is unique, and you want to keep them all alive. However, in this case which is a remake of the first game in the series, only a handful of characters ever affect the plot. Also, this game is slightly on the easier side of the Fire Emblem series, and actually has quite a few different difficulty settings (I don't think I ever lost a character while playing it on standard difficulty). Anyway, it was surprisingly fun, and as I said, I'm selling/trading this copy because it's an extra ![]()
Pages: 1
